The Relationship between Nutritional Status and Anthropometric Measurements of Preschool Children in a Sierra Leonean Clay Factory Displaced Camp
AbstractWeight is a sensitive index for the evaluation of nutritional status of preschool children, particularly where their precise ages are known. Regrettably in Sierra Leone there are no known local standards of weight of preschool children and their ages are most times difficult to obtain. Thus weight alone cannot be the most suitable index in the evaluation of the nutritional status of preschool children in Sierra Leone. Thus the current study was undertaken to determine the relative merits of anthropometric measurements commonly used in nutrition survey for the evaluation of the nutritional status of preschool children in the clay factory displaced camp. Three hundred and six (306) children of both sexes aged 1-5 years were classified into three groups: Normal, protein-energy malnutrition (PEM) and vitamin deficiency (VD). The relative importance of the various anthropometric measurements was assessed in these three categories of children through comparison of their mean values and correlation coefficients. A close relationship was observed between the severity of PEM on the one hand and weight, weight-height ratio and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) on the other. The indices weight and weight-height ratio were found to be very sensitive in the assessment of nutritional status of the children. Moreover, these indices showed a close association with other measurements. It was concluded that the weight-height ratio which is independent of age, is the most suitable index for the detection of early cases of PEM in our environment
Delarue J, Constans T, Malvy D, Iradignac A,
Couet C and Lamisse F (1994). Anthropometric values in an elderly French population. Br. J.
Nutri. 71: 295-302.
Dugdale AE (1971). An age-independent anthropometric index of nutritional status. Am. J. Clin.
Nutri. 24: 174.
Durnin JVGA De Bruin H and Feunekes GIJ (1997). Skinfold thickness: Is there a need to be very
precise in their location? Br J Nutri. 77: 3-7.
Gouge AL and Ekvall SW (1975). Diets of handicapped children, physical, psychological and
socio-economic correlations. Am. J. Mental Deficiency. 80:149-157
Jelliffe DB, Stanfield P, Brueton M, Chan M, Parkin M and Waterson T (1985). Diseases of
children in the tropics and subtropics (4th. edition).
Jelliffe DB (1966). The assessment of the nutritional status of the community. WHO monograph No.
Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on malnutrition (1971). WHO technical report.
Marilyn D, Johnson, MS, William K, Yamanaka, PHD, Candelaria S and Formacion MS (1984). A
Comparison of Anthropometric Methods for Assessing Nutritional Status of Preschool Children:
The Philippines Study. J Trop Pediatr.
McCann M (1973). Evaluation of nutritional status.
Pediatr Ann. 2:64
Rao VK and Singh D (1970). An evaluation of the
relationship between nutritional status and anthropometric measurements. Am J Clin Nutri.
Robinson M and Jelliffe DB (1966). Intercorrelations between anthropometric variables. A
contribution to nutritional anthropometry of infancy and early childhood in developing countries.
Proceedings of the VIII International Congress on Nutrition, Hamburg. Pp:
Shantha M, Susheela TP and Swamineth MC (1967). Association of growth status and the prevalence
of nutritional deficiency signs among preschool children. Indian J Med Res. 55:497.
Sharma B, Mitra M, Chakrabarty S and Bharati P (2006). Nutritional Status of Preschool Children of
Raj Gond - a Tribal Population in Madhya
Pradesh, India. Malaysian J. Nutri. 12:147-155
Smith DS and Brown ML (1970). Anthropometry in preschool children in Hawaii. Am J Clin Nutri.
Sudesh J, Saroj B and Salil S (2000). Nutritional status of rural pre-school children of Haryana
state. Indian J Pediatr. 67: 189-196
Waterlow JC (1972). Classification and definition of protein-calorie malnutrition. Br Med.J.
WHO Technical Report Series No. 258 (1963) Expert Committee on Medical Assessment of
Nutritional Status. WHO, Geneva.